msp1976
04-15 06:38 AM
We do know that Senate plans to debate STRIVE in second half of May.
Senate would probably debate some version of immigration bill late may...It may or may or may be not be strive..
Senate would probably debate some version of immigration bill late may...It may or may or may be not be strive..
wallpaper Japanese Shoulder Flower
ilikekilo
06-14 04:57 PM
Barbara Firstenberg -- try them
ritwik_ind
10-26 10:00 AM
Hi there,
This is my post for the contest. :eye:
http://http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpghttp://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpg
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpg
hope you like it, [Wish me luck!! ]
Cheers,
Twik
Mans mind, once stretched by an idea, never attains its original dimensions.
This is my post for the contest. :eye:
http://http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpghttp://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpg
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpg
hope you like it, [Wish me luck!! ]
Cheers,
Twik
Mans mind, once stretched by an idea, never attains its original dimensions.
2011 flower tattoos on shoulder.
Blog Feeds
07-23 04:20 AM
Immigration Law Headlines Has Just Posted the Following:
More... (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2010,0722-dzubow.shtm)
More... (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2010,0722-dzubow.shtm)
more...
looivy
08-13 10:07 AM
Hi Gurus,
I am in my 9th year H1-B. I have my I-140 approved and I-485 pending since July 2007 through employer A (EB-3).
Employer B is willing to hire me on H1-B (transfer) using AC21 portability (and similarity of jobs). After the move, employer A will revoke my I-140 for sure.
Can I apply for an H1-B transfer with employer C after a year or two using AC21 portability? I do not want to use EAD. I want to use H1-B tansfer (3 year extensions)?
This is a major decision that I have to make.
Please reply at your earliest convenience.
Thanks.
I am in my 9th year H1-B. I have my I-140 approved and I-485 pending since July 2007 through employer A (EB-3).
Employer B is willing to hire me on H1-B (transfer) using AC21 portability (and similarity of jobs). After the move, employer A will revoke my I-140 for sure.
Can I apply for an H1-B transfer with employer C after a year or two using AC21 portability? I do not want to use EAD. I want to use H1-B tansfer (3 year extensions)?
This is a major decision that I have to make.
Please reply at your earliest convenience.
Thanks.
Lasantha
06-25 06:28 PM
G-325 form 11 th line must be filled or not in mother languages write name and address plss help
What is your question?
If your question is "Do you have to write your name in your native script in Form G-325 in addition to writing it in Roman alphabet?" -
Yes, you do.
Lasantha
What is your question?
If your question is "Do you have to write your name in your native script in Form G-325 in addition to writing it in Roman alphabet?" -
Yes, you do.
Lasantha
more...
Steve Mitchell
December 12th, 2003, 05:08 PM
Welcome to Dphoto...definitely a gorgeous shade of green. We look forward to seeing more pix as well. Make sure to use the Forum Members Gallery...you are already registered there as well as the Member Reviews area. BTW, love your username. Coffee is my blood.
2010 Cherry Blossom Flower Tattoo
bond65
07-27 04:03 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
bump... bump....bump
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
bump... bump....bump
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
more...
leenakamat
07-07 04:28 PM
Hi Sukhpreet, are you sure the actual petition was filed and denied, or just the labor condition application (LCA) was denied? The LCA is one component of the H-1B petition; it requires a valid FEIN number, and it needs to be certified in order for the H-1B petition to be filed. Most likely, this is what has been denied because the DOL could not find/match the number. The lawyer can just refile the LCA with the appropriate IRS documentation, and it should be certified within a week. The H-1B petition can then be filed with the certified LCA.
hair Tattoo of Lily Flower and
cs007
10-31 12:28 AM
Hi, I am in 8th year of H1b with 140 approved (EB3) from company A. I would like to switch to company B and planning to start EB2 quickly to enage a new interesting project . I have following questions related to the same and early advice from you all would be highly appreciated as am running out of time in engaging the new project.
1. Can I do H1 transfer from company A to company B using A's 140 approval after my 6 years of original h1b quota. I am currently on 8th year of h1b.
2. Can I able to port the priority date from company A's EB3 filing with the new EB2 filing from company B?
3. If company A cancels the 140, still can I able to port the PD ?
thanks.
CS
1. Can I do H1 transfer from company A to company B using A's 140 approval after my 6 years of original h1b quota. I am currently on 8th year of h1b.
2. Can I able to port the priority date from company A's EB3 filing with the new EB2 filing from company B?
3. If company A cancels the 140, still can I able to port the PD ?
thanks.
CS
more...
nicpearcenrs
03-18 11:31 PM
Most of the people facing this same problem. But some body got the solution. Some body can not get solution. If you get the solution please share that information to everyone. It is very helpful for who are facing the same problem.
Thank you
..............
Nic
Payroll India (http://www.topsyssolutions.com)
Thank you
..............
Nic
Payroll India (http://www.topsyssolutions.com)
hot Shoulder tribal flower tattoos
max714
02-22 08:34 PM
I am a July filer and have the option of working for a reputable company as expert consultant for 6 months (initial offer). Yates memo indicates that self-employment is possible. Here is my question: Do we need to register a company to be considered self-employed? As a consultant you may not have a customer for while. Isn't it better to register a company if you want to claim self employment? What are the pros and cons of registering a company?
more...
house Flowers Tattoos#13
enthu999
07-25 02:41 PM
My country of citizenship is Canada and currently working on TN status. Canada is covered under Visa waiver program so, I don't need to get visa stamping but need to travel through a POE so, I could get new I-94 for the H validity period.
In the I-129, I have opted for Calgary as POE, but due to some reasons now I have to travel via Toronto, would that be ok?
In the I-129, I have opted for Calgary as POE, but due to some reasons now I have to travel via Toronto, would that be ok?
tattoo Shoulder Flower Tattoos
pod1
10-21 12:38 AM
I am in 6th year of my H1B. It is expiring in Aug 2011.
Here are some details:
- My I-140 is approved with a priority date of Aug 2006 under EB2-India.
- I did not apply for I-485 so I do not have a EAD.
- My wife is also on H1B which expires in Aug 2012.
Here are my questions:
1) If I apply for H1B extension in July 2011 under regular processing and assuming it takes 4-5 months for USCIS to process the application, can I still continue to work? For how many days can I work if visa renewal is still in processing after the visa has expired.
2) If I get a denial of H1B extension do I become out of status from the date of denial or from the day H1B got expired?
3) If I get a denial of H1B extension can I immediately apply for H4 as a dependent to my wife's visa without any issues?
4) If I get a denial of H1B extension, what happens to my I-140? Is it automatically invalid?
5) If I do convert to H4 status and my priority date becomes current can I apply for I-485?
Here are some details:
- My I-140 is approved with a priority date of Aug 2006 under EB2-India.
- I did not apply for I-485 so I do not have a EAD.
- My wife is also on H1B which expires in Aug 2012.
Here are my questions:
1) If I apply for H1B extension in July 2011 under regular processing and assuming it takes 4-5 months for USCIS to process the application, can I still continue to work? For how many days can I work if visa renewal is still in processing after the visa has expired.
2) If I get a denial of H1B extension do I become out of status from the date of denial or from the day H1B got expired?
3) If I get a denial of H1B extension can I immediately apply for H4 as a dependent to my wife's visa without any issues?
4) If I get a denial of H1B extension, what happens to my I-140? Is it automatically invalid?
5) If I do convert to H4 status and my priority date becomes current can I apply for I-485?
more...
pictures The exotic flower tattoo
mundakamal1
10-14 06:28 AM
I appeared for h1b stamping at new Delhi us embassy. VO kept my passport and forms for admin processing. VO told me it may take 2-4 weeks. they didn't give me any slips ( pink/yellow/green). I am not sure what kind of processing they wanted to do in my case
here is my case
PIMS found
h1b change of employer about 2 months ago
working for desi consulting company for last 4 years. new employer is a big American company
Undergrad from US university.
VO mentioned its random check
here is my case
PIMS found
h1b change of employer about 2 months ago
working for desi consulting company for last 4 years. new employer is a big American company
Undergrad from US university.
VO mentioned its random check
dresses Shoulder Flower Tattoos
Macaca
07-29 06:03 PM
Bet on India (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/28/AR2007072800999.html) The Bush administration presses forward with a nuclear agreement -- and hopes for a strategic partnership. July 29, 2007
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
more...
makeup asian flower tattoo. flower
HelloWorld2007
10-18 08:54 PM
Hi friends..
If any one of you have walked-in succesfully at detroit ASC, pls post your experience. I have received my FP notice, but want to prepone it since I have to travel overseas. I was wondering what would be a good time and day to go. Pls post your experiences..
thanks for your time
If any one of you have walked-in succesfully at detroit ASC, pls post your experience. I have received my FP notice, but want to prepone it since I have to travel overseas. I was wondering what would be a good time and day to go. Pls post your experiences..
thanks for your time
girlfriend pictures flower tattoos
abhis0
11-20 07:15 PM
Hi,
I filed for extension of H1B through my company A. I got notified today that my H1B filed was sponsored by sister company B. My GC was filed by Company A in July 2007 with PD of EB3 2004 December.
Would my GC process be impacted by this mess? Since GC process was started by company A, which would now be ex-company due to company B being new H1B sponsor. I am still on H1B.
Does it make sense to invoke AC21.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
MK
I filed for extension of H1B through my company A. I got notified today that my H1B filed was sponsored by sister company B. My GC was filed by Company A in July 2007 with PD of EB3 2004 December.
Would my GC process be impacted by this mess? Since GC process was started by company A, which would now be ex-company due to company B being new H1B sponsor. I am still on H1B.
Does it make sense to invoke AC21.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
MK
hairstyles makeup Flower Tattoo Shoulder
Blog Feeds
07-27 03:40 PM
There's a phrase in American pop culture - "jump the shark" that seems appropriate about now. I guess in the facing rapidly declining ratings, Mr. Dobbs is resorting to even more extreme rhetoric and has now joined the "birthers" desperately peddling one of the sillier conspiracy theories out there. While it showed weak moral stamina, I could at least understand the economic reasoning behind CNN keeping Dobbs on the air when his show was producing healthy ratings. But even that justification for leaving him in prime time has evaporated. It's time to pull the plug. Hat tip to George C....
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/dobbs-suggest-obama-is-undocumented.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/dobbs-suggest-obama-is-undocumented.html)
Blog Feeds
05-30 12:30 PM
Tam Ngoc Tran died on May 16th in a car accident. She was a doctoral student in American Civilization at Brown University. I had a brief encounter with this intelligent and lovely young lady in 2006 when I visited UCLA to assist foreign-born students in finding solutions to their immigration problems. Each of the students told me his or her story. Most shared the following themes: They were born in other countries and brought to the U.S. as toddlers. They grew up believing that they were born in the U.S. and that if they studied hard and got good grades,...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/05/she-died-but-her-dream-lives-on.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/05/she-died-but-her-dream-lives-on.html)
srikondoji
08-10 11:15 AM
As per google trend, 'september 2010 visa bulletin' is 40th most popular search in past 1 hour.
No comments:
Post a Comment