madhavimorusu
01-15 04:02 PM
All,
I have my I140 approved under EB3 with the PD Aug'2003 with the employer A. Now I am planning to switch to employer B for filing Labor under EB2 category.
My question is Can I avail the PD i.e Aug'2003 got from the previous labor EB3 (i.s employer A) for the new EB2 labor with employer B.
My Exp: B.E + 8 Yrs of Progressive Exp.
Employer A:
labor : EB3 Approved PD AUG'2003
I140: Approved
Employer B:
labor: EB2 under process.
I would appreciate your reply, any attorneys pls.
I have my I140 approved under EB3 with the PD Aug'2003 with the employer A. Now I am planning to switch to employer B for filing Labor under EB2 category.
My question is Can I avail the PD i.e Aug'2003 got from the previous labor EB3 (i.s employer A) for the new EB2 labor with employer B.
My Exp: B.E + 8 Yrs of Progressive Exp.
Employer A:
labor : EB3 Approved PD AUG'2003
I140: Approved
Employer B:
labor: EB2 under process.
I would appreciate your reply, any attorneys pls.
wallpaper Gigantic Floral Designs Singer embroidery
pd_recapturing
09-15 10:39 PM
I also need to know the answer of this question. Please someone suggest.
msp1976
02-18 07:06 PM
May be we can add a primer on how to evaluate a bill when it comes out of the senate or house in next few months...
We can define places to look in the text for specific goals listed on the front page...Section wise....
We can define places to look in the text for specific goals listed on the front page...Section wise....
2011 embroidery floral design
sam2006
10-01 02:49 PM
Its common
many have got blank PD on RNs
many have got blank PD on RNs
more...
ashrock11
09-13 08:15 PM
Hi,
My I-485 case was approved on 7/23, got approval letter on 7/30.
In August I got the Code 3 Biometrics letter and now I got it for Code 2. Two Biometrics appointment within a month!
Does this usually happen? No CPO e-mails or card yet!
Thanks
My I-485 case was approved on 7/23, got approval letter on 7/30.
In August I got the Code 3 Biometrics letter and now I got it for Code 2. Two Biometrics appointment within a month!
Does this usually happen? No CPO e-mails or card yet!
Thanks
rick_rajvanshi
02-25 07:26 PM
I found the following link on USCIS web site
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=97e19c337879d110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=54519c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
Does this mean that USCIS is trying to speedup pending 485's ?
Read here and draw your own conclusions
http://imminfo.com/Newsletter/2009-2/AOS.html
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=97e19c337879d110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=54519c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
Does this mean that USCIS is trying to speedup pending 485's ?
Read here and draw your own conclusions
http://imminfo.com/Newsletter/2009-2/AOS.html
more...
quizzer
10-11 05:18 PM
You can get it corrected at the ASC.
It doesnt hurt calling USCIS as well.
It doesnt hurt calling USCIS as well.
2010 embroidery designs, floral
Ajaykumar
08-25 01:14 PM
Hi Friends,
I'm working with employer A and my PERM labor got certified with employer B. My second H1B duration ends Sep 2011 (12 months) and I can recapture 5 months.
1. Will I get 3 yrs of H1B extension if do the H1B transfer after my I-140 with employer B is approved.
2. Will I get 2 years of H1B extension (09/2011 + 1 yr with approved Labor) if I do H1B transfer now?
3. I went for a vacation and returned US just now. My employer A has generated pay stub only for a week and forgot to pay for the vacation. Is it Ok to submit partially paid last pay stub for the H1B transfer. FYI, I've all the other pay stubs for the previous months.
It'll really helpful to decide based on the folks replies. Thanks alot for the help.
Regards,
Ajaykumar
I'm working with employer A and my PERM labor got certified with employer B. My second H1B duration ends Sep 2011 (12 months) and I can recapture 5 months.
1. Will I get 3 yrs of H1B extension if do the H1B transfer after my I-140 with employer B is approved.
2. Will I get 2 years of H1B extension (09/2011 + 1 yr with approved Labor) if I do H1B transfer now?
3. I went for a vacation and returned US just now. My employer A has generated pay stub only for a week and forgot to pay for the vacation. Is it Ok to submit partially paid last pay stub for the H1B transfer. FYI, I've all the other pay stubs for the previous months.
It'll really helpful to decide based on the folks replies. Thanks alot for the help.
Regards,
Ajaykumar
more...
kingkon_2000
08-07 04:06 PM
Yesterday I received email that card production ordered and today it says I have to go through some ADIT processing. Does this mean that they require some additional documents for processing or verification. The exact message is as below...
"On August 6, 2010, we mailed you a notice that we had registered this customer's new permanent resident status. Please follow any instructions on the notice. Your new permanent resident card should be mailed within 60 days following this registration or after you complete any ADIT processing referred to in the welcome notice, whichever is later. If you move before receiving your card, please call our customer service center at 1-800-375-5283.
During this step the formal decision (approved/denied) is written and the decision notice is mailed and/or emailed to the applicant/petitioner. You can use our current processing time to gauge when you can expect to receive a final decision.
"
Can anyone please tell me what this means.
Thanks in advance..
Bookmark and Share
"On August 6, 2010, we mailed you a notice that we had registered this customer's new permanent resident status. Please follow any instructions on the notice. Your new permanent resident card should be mailed within 60 days following this registration or after you complete any ADIT processing referred to in the welcome notice, whichever is later. If you move before receiving your card, please call our customer service center at 1-800-375-5283.
During this step the formal decision (approved/denied) is written and the decision notice is mailed and/or emailed to the applicant/petitioner. You can use our current processing time to gauge when you can expect to receive a final decision.
"
Can anyone please tell me what this means.
Thanks in advance..
Bookmark and Share
hair crewel embroidery design
Macaca
06-01 07:26 PM
Pelosi�s Order in the House (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/us/politics/01web-hulse.html) By CARL HULSE (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/us/politics/01web-hulse.html), June 1, 2007
The differences between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her predecessor, J. Dennis Hastert, could not be more striking.
He is a burly former wrestling coach, a conservative Republican from small-town Illinois who usually ran from the microphones. She is the designer-clad member of a political family, a wealthy liberal from San Francisco who sees herself as a top party spokeswoman.
But what could turn out to be their defining contrast was exhibited on May 24, when Ms. Pelosi allowed the Iraq war spending bill to clear the House with predominantly Republican votes while most Democrats � including her � opposed it. It was a marked departure from the principle that guided Mr. Hastert during his years as speaker.
Mr. Hastert was an advocate of governing the House by a �majority of the majority� � a standard he thought best served the interests of his Republican members and, by extension, the nation. Just months into her tenure, Ms. Pelosi has shown she will deviate from that approach, balancing the potential of significant rewards against big risks.
The rewards could come from success in winning approval of major legislation that reaches beyond party label. Critics of Mr. Hastert said his self-imposed rule prevented the House from considering centrist social and economic measures that, in their view, could have benefited both parties. It is likely, for instance, that a coalition existed in the House last year to pass an immigration overhaul that Republicans and Democrats could have hailed going into the elections. But strong opposition from a majority of the majority derailed that idea.
The risks are related to party cohesion. If a leader such as Ms. Pelosi regularly cuts against the wishes of most of the people who put her in leadership, it stands to reason they would eventually wonder if new leadership was warranted. At a more subtle level, passing important bills with coalitions built outside party lines can expose and deepen fractures within them and sap the support of interest groups that can be essential to winning and holding onto power.
Republicans see internal problems for Democrats as they sort through how to govern. �The problem for Pelosi is that the majority of her majority still has a minority mindset,� said John Feehery, a lobbyist who was an adviser to Mr. Hastert. �They would rather protest than legislate. And that dynamic will weaken her control over the House in the long-run."
While some anti-war groups remain outraged at the war vote, many Democrats were not all that upset with the way she handled it. Through some procedural maneuvers, the speaker allowed Democrats to back a minimum wage increase and popular domestic spending and still vote against the war money. At the same time, Democrats got out of what the leadership saw as a political jam that could have left them being blamed for cutting off money to troops overseas.
The next test for Ms. Pelosi will come on looming votes over increased free trade. Many - perhaps most - House Democrats are leery of going along with the push by President Bush, free-trading Democrats and congressional Republicans for new trade deals that they believe ship jobs out of the country and lack labor and environmental safeguards.
To some veteran House Democrats, the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement is a particularly bitter memory. A majority of then-minority Republicans joined with a minority of then-majority Democrats to pass the deal sought by President Bill Clinton. Quite a few Democrats believe that approval of the trade deal over the objections of organized labor diluted union support in 1994 and contributed to the loss of Congress by the Democrats that year. Ms. Pelosi was among 102 Democrats who backed the 1993 trade deal; 156 Democrats, including the majority leader and whip, opposed it.
Anti-trade Democrats are worried the war vote foreshadowed Ms. Pelosi making a similar trade move this year, forgetting the hard lessons of NAFTA. They promise that such a decision will stir strong resentment. Ms. Pelosi has urged lawmakers not to jump to conclusions, but she is making no guarantees that legislation must have majority Democratic backing.
�I have to take into consideration something broader than the majority of the majority in the Democratic Caucus,� she told reporters.
The differences between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her predecessor, J. Dennis Hastert, could not be more striking.
He is a burly former wrestling coach, a conservative Republican from small-town Illinois who usually ran from the microphones. She is the designer-clad member of a political family, a wealthy liberal from San Francisco who sees herself as a top party spokeswoman.
But what could turn out to be their defining contrast was exhibited on May 24, when Ms. Pelosi allowed the Iraq war spending bill to clear the House with predominantly Republican votes while most Democrats � including her � opposed it. It was a marked departure from the principle that guided Mr. Hastert during his years as speaker.
Mr. Hastert was an advocate of governing the House by a �majority of the majority� � a standard he thought best served the interests of his Republican members and, by extension, the nation. Just months into her tenure, Ms. Pelosi has shown she will deviate from that approach, balancing the potential of significant rewards against big risks.
The rewards could come from success in winning approval of major legislation that reaches beyond party label. Critics of Mr. Hastert said his self-imposed rule prevented the House from considering centrist social and economic measures that, in their view, could have benefited both parties. It is likely, for instance, that a coalition existed in the House last year to pass an immigration overhaul that Republicans and Democrats could have hailed going into the elections. But strong opposition from a majority of the majority derailed that idea.
The risks are related to party cohesion. If a leader such as Ms. Pelosi regularly cuts against the wishes of most of the people who put her in leadership, it stands to reason they would eventually wonder if new leadership was warranted. At a more subtle level, passing important bills with coalitions built outside party lines can expose and deepen fractures within them and sap the support of interest groups that can be essential to winning and holding onto power.
Republicans see internal problems for Democrats as they sort through how to govern. �The problem for Pelosi is that the majority of her majority still has a minority mindset,� said John Feehery, a lobbyist who was an adviser to Mr. Hastert. �They would rather protest than legislate. And that dynamic will weaken her control over the House in the long-run."
While some anti-war groups remain outraged at the war vote, many Democrats were not all that upset with the way she handled it. Through some procedural maneuvers, the speaker allowed Democrats to back a minimum wage increase and popular domestic spending and still vote against the war money. At the same time, Democrats got out of what the leadership saw as a political jam that could have left them being blamed for cutting off money to troops overseas.
The next test for Ms. Pelosi will come on looming votes over increased free trade. Many - perhaps most - House Democrats are leery of going along with the push by President Bush, free-trading Democrats and congressional Republicans for new trade deals that they believe ship jobs out of the country and lack labor and environmental safeguards.
To some veteran House Democrats, the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement is a particularly bitter memory. A majority of then-minority Republicans joined with a minority of then-majority Democrats to pass the deal sought by President Bill Clinton. Quite a few Democrats believe that approval of the trade deal over the objections of organized labor diluted union support in 1994 and contributed to the loss of Congress by the Democrats that year. Ms. Pelosi was among 102 Democrats who backed the 1993 trade deal; 156 Democrats, including the majority leader and whip, opposed it.
Anti-trade Democrats are worried the war vote foreshadowed Ms. Pelosi making a similar trade move this year, forgetting the hard lessons of NAFTA. They promise that such a decision will stir strong resentment. Ms. Pelosi has urged lawmakers not to jump to conclusions, but she is making no guarantees that legislation must have majority Democratic backing.
�I have to take into consideration something broader than the majority of the majority in the Democratic Caucus,� she told reporters.
more...
apb
07-19 07:25 PM
It should be as per June bulletin. My lawyer also has same opinion
hot the Floral Square design,
apnair2002
10-30 06:32 AM
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2006/10/immigration_is_.html
(Are you feeling the impact of immigration? What is life like for an illegal immigrant living in the USA, and for others in the communities where he or she works and lives? We�re interested in hearing your experiences. Send comments to editor@usatoday.com or fax to 703-854-2053. Please include your contact number, city and state for verification purposes. Comments will be considered for an ongoing conversation in letters and online.)
(Are you feeling the impact of immigration? What is life like for an illegal immigrant living in the USA, and for others in the communities where he or she works and lives? We�re interested in hearing your experiences. Send comments to editor@usatoday.com or fax to 703-854-2053. Please include your contact number, city and state for verification purposes. Comments will be considered for an ongoing conversation in letters and online.)
more...
house It#39;s the embroidery designs
aristotle
07-12 07:18 PM
My wife is planning to travel overseas for 3 months and return on AP. Her status is AoS(dependent) as she quit working on H1 a few months ago. Any experience using AP for such long stays outside the country? Please share your experiences.
Thanks!
Thanks!
tattoo Floral Embroidered Top $17.80
kalyan
07-12 08:32 AM
Talk to an attorney he should be able to kiss your employer's ass with lot of things.
If your employer is paying more than what is mentioned in H1B, then you cannot do anything.
If you are working on % basis, then forget about 14k if till you work for him, prorate of H1B pay is paid.
If your employer is paying more than what is mentioned in H1B, then you cannot do anything.
If you are working on % basis, then forget about 14k if till you work for him, prorate of H1B pay is paid.
more...
pictures Machine Embroidery Designs
newuser
10-16 10:51 PM
Local State Chapters - Please update the activities as they happen so that members get to know about them
Setraheep - Thanks for the update
Setraheep - Thanks for the update
dresses Floral Teacups Hand Embroidery
validIV
03-17 01:04 PM
How many years have you been on H-1?
more...
makeup floral embroidery designs for
CantLeaveAmerica
03-17 09:39 PM
Hi,
I have been without a pay for 2 months now, will that affect my I-485 application which was filed in July 07
I have been without a pay for 2 months now, will that affect my I-485 application which was filed in July 07
girlfriend Embroidery Floral Designs 98
moniquetrinh
08-31 12:16 PM
Please help me, married a us citizen right after 3 months I have my green card in 08 we got into a fight and she divorced me 2 months later and finally decreee june 2008. we are back together and live in the same house hold and in feb 2010 when my green card expire and I need to file to remove the condition, I dont know what I or we need to do?? is this the better way is for us go down to court house and get married again? we still have banking account together and bill together>
Please let me know what is the best for my situation.
thank you very much
sincerely
tu
Please let me know what is the best for my situation.
thank you very much
sincerely
tu
hairstyles Floral border details
santoshmn
06-17 12:47 PM
Hi all,
My PERM labour certification was filed on 25th oct 2006, my case was selected for random audit on dec 06. My attorney replied with all the evidence for the audit. After reviewing the case CO at dol denied my case on Feb 07.
My attorney has asked my case to be reconsidered/reopen on March 2007 as they are confident that they have supplied all the documents required for the case. My attorney says it will take 6-8 months for DOL reopen the case and judicate the same which is Nov 07. what is best option i have as all the dates are current now? i have discussed with my attorney they have told me clearly they are not going to reapply as its a very big company and it will take lot of time for me to get clearance to file my perm again.
Does anybody having experience like my case can share your views it will be really helpful.
Thanks,
Santosh.M.N
My PERM labour certification was filed on 25th oct 2006, my case was selected for random audit on dec 06. My attorney replied with all the evidence for the audit. After reviewing the case CO at dol denied my case on Feb 07.
My attorney has asked my case to be reconsidered/reopen on March 2007 as they are confident that they have supplied all the documents required for the case. My attorney says it will take 6-8 months for DOL reopen the case and judicate the same which is Nov 07. what is best option i have as all the dates are current now? i have discussed with my attorney they have told me clearly they are not going to reapply as its a very big company and it will take lot of time for me to get clearance to file my perm again.
Does anybody having experience like my case can share your views it will be really helpful.
Thanks,
Santosh.M.N
what_now
06-05 08:33 AM
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Green%20Card/Green%20Card%20Through%20a%20Job/Employment%20Based%20I-485%20Pending%20Inventory%20as%20of%20May%2027%202 010.pdf
tabletpc
01-09 12:00 PM
Can anyone throw some light on this query...
I presently work for a cap excempt employer and now looking for employer who could file for my h1b under cap subjected in the month of april witha start date of oct 2008.
I would like the new employer to file my visa in such a way that, i could still continue with my present full time job even after oct 2008. Based on what i have understood, i guess if the new employer files as "COncurrent H1b" then i can join him at my wish after oct 2008 provided new emplyer has not revoked my h1b. Am i right..???
Also ..how many concurrent h1b can i have at a time..???
I don't want to miss this year quota, so want to make sure i take all precaution to get h1b cleared.
Greatly apprecite inputs...
I presently work for a cap excempt employer and now looking for employer who could file for my h1b under cap subjected in the month of april witha start date of oct 2008.
I would like the new employer to file my visa in such a way that, i could still continue with my present full time job even after oct 2008. Based on what i have understood, i guess if the new employer files as "COncurrent H1b" then i can join him at my wish after oct 2008 provided new emplyer has not revoked my h1b. Am i right..???
Also ..how many concurrent h1b can i have at a time..???
I don't want to miss this year quota, so want to make sure i take all precaution to get h1b cleared.
Greatly apprecite inputs...
No comments:
Post a Comment